Amidst continuing financial woes,
Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg stated earlier today that the government will
not change course on spending cuts.
Of course, the long mocked slogan
‘I agree with Nick’ from the previous electoral campaign rings ever more true,
as the Lib Dem defence of the cuts outlines how far they have backed from
original party politics in order to hang on to the coattails of power.
Despite declaring that his party
would stand up for themselves more openly in May, Clegg has reiterated that the
cuts will continue as projected, amongst growing concerns of a double dip
recession.
Following moves from the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) earlier this week, there are rumours that £5bn
could be released to deal with boosting economy infrastructure. Within the past
few days, the IMF cut its growth forecast for the British economy not only for
2011 but subsequently for 2012 too, despite the prospect of being the Olympic
host. In addition, the organisation said the government should delay its
deficit reduction programme if growth slowed further, or risk loss of consumer
confidence and a deeper recession.
Ministers pushing for such a move
believe it would not be seen as a U-turn as the money would be capital
spending, on infrastructure projects like roads, rail and broadband, rather
than current spending.
However, Nick Clegg insists that
the ruling coalition is not about to alter the course of its plans over any of
the concerns. It is thought that such a move would again raise eyebrows and
threaten already stalling growth figures.
Of course, this is not likely to
help Clegg’s tumbling popularity figures, which in turn could lead to a
situation by which the nation would want to ratify a different route of
recovery.
In the wake of the widespread
riots that overran various UK cities last month, there was a perceived
understanding that the government would alter several of its policies in
response to such an unpredicted outcry of sentiment. Whilst various reasons
have been attributed to the sudden unleashing of fervour, one of the most
resounding put forward is that many people believe that they have little money
and little leisure time and space, whilst a capitalist economy boasts the many
luxuries that are outside swaths of Britons’ pockets.
Remembering a time when election politics foretold a riot if Tory cuts were implemented, it seems as if Clegg has not fully appreciated the wisdom of his own words.
Yet in spite of such scenes,
Clegg presents the recovery as it stands as “the right thing, not the easy
thing”.
It appears that it is a game of
nerve and cheek. Reflecting on the economy as ‘a game’ firstly is not going to
install any confidence. But it would seem that here lies the government’s wish
that the city hold firm in the face of probing questions and concerns over the
state of finances in Italy and Greece.
The aim is to continue with the
outlined plans so as to “build a new economy. An economy for the whole nation.”
However, Clegg’s bravado does not
muster the same feeling of unity that it did in May 2010. Such idealistic views
are no longer heeded with the same anticipation and there remains a great unease
that this latest government has made little headway into resolving the deficit
crisis over its 16 months in Westminster.
Cries of ‘I agree with Nick’ are now
few and far between.
No comments:
Post a Comment