Thursday, 20 October 2011

World Wide Wake


Shocking in timing and emotional in the response it produced, the death of Steve Jobs earlier this month left an apple sized hole in the technology industry.

Jobs, who had been battling cancer for some time, notably without prescribed medicines over a lengthy period, died at the premature age of 56. His ingenuity has seen a complete transformation of the role that technology plays in our daily life and the way in which most people interact with such inventions.

Even just over a decade ago, computers were only just becoming a personal item; previous they had been the reserve of the social elite at science universities and laboratories. Alongside competition from Bill Gates’ infamous Windows operating system, Apple launched their own brand of computer and had seen its ‘fruitition’ into one of the most promising pieces of home computing available to the public.

However, whilst the advent of the personal computer was heralded as a marvel and a breakthrough, with the benefit of hindsight, it is easy to reflect that this was an inevitable and not so shocking development in the spectrum of technology use.

Evidently, such an idea of progression was not lost on Jobs. Quickly, he started to expand the apple corporation from this small niche into the most exciting market adventure.

While great swathes of technologists spend painstaking hours attempting to reinvent current products, working out kinks that were probably insignificant in the first place, Jobs took a novel approach to his work. In combining latest ideas and technologies, Jobs wanted Apple to represent the latest consumer products that had never been imagined.

Consider for a moment, the idea of a multifunctional MP3, with large screen and wheel for easy navigation. Back in 2001, that was not only unique, it was quite unimagined in the testing infancy of such portable devices. The IPhone, again, was revolutionary in that it almost pre-empted a consumer fantasy of compact that has now permeated to be the norm. Who needs to carry two items, when one suffices?

King of the off-the-wall-come-instantly-appreciated techy gadgets sits the IPad. Upon its inception, the IPad baffled a number of people. A tablet computer that seemed to operate as a large model of an IPhone. Where was the market? What was its purpose? It almost appeared an invention for the sake of invention.

Yet within very little time, it was soon comprehended that due to excellent battery life, apps, and compatible features, this device could revolutionise the way business is transacted on one hand, whilst being able to support student projects and family face time all in one. A cumbersome Windows laptop needed to boast new Intel processors in order to revive any competitivity.

The Genius of Jobs then was not so much his ability to bring out cutting edge products; it was his ability to conceive devices of which no one had considered the proper functionability.

Nowadays, in any global city, you can barely walk for chance of accosting someone with an Apple product on their being: be that the daydreamer plugged into their IPod, or awkward attempts to sneak a peek at the IPad sat across from you on the daily commute. Apple have managed to infiltrate social norms by proffering a swifter and more dynamic way to keep in touch and manage one’s life whilst ‘on-the-go’

In fact, it has been suggested that if you were to try and get a picture of what drives social evolution in the 21st century, you could do a lot worse than take time to muse over Apple’s sudden dominance.

Whilst Jobs understood that the 21st century was about becoming an individual and increasingly independent in our approach (after all, we are increasingly only in touch through social networking and emails), this trend is one in which everyone shares.

Therefore, Jobs has managed to capture the spirit and essence of two domains: the business and the personal in all of his products. The range of apps and downloads and styli available for each variant device is astronomical: there is a personal touch to every Apple appliance, for each user is unique. This allows them to break away from corporations that dominated the 1990s.

However, at the same time, Apple has built itself to be a community: every one shares in their collective experiences of these contraptions, so as not to become isolated and confused in a world that is ever so more connected by the internet and computing.

Jobs own spin was to claim that “It’s not the consumers’ job to know what they want.”

Poignant, the remark goes against the grain of fundamental capitalism, wherein a company should be able to provide services in a market designed by a clientele.

Revolutionising not just our communication pattern then, Jobs altered the way in which a market should respond to its customers. His apparently random approach actually serves as a lesson to a great number of inventors and techie-folk: during a period of down-turn, the items that are to see companies through varying problems are those which capture, inspire and are totally unpredicted by their public.

Ironically, Steve Jobs understood public sentiment better than most politicians in this case.

The essence of the IPad is that it can be anything that you want it to be. Jobs, it seemed, was a visionary who could imagine anything that we wanted.

Perhaps the greatest testament to his legacy is that his death was first brought to the public attention on a device he himself launched.

No comments:

Post a Comment