In economic downturn, any politician’s own trivial punch at
the current state of the financial crisis can really knock confidence and cause
extra downturn and problems.
But this has not phased Jacques Delors, one of the main
architects of the single European currency, the Euro. Perhaps his honesty is
the wake up call needed for future generations to never again be so flippant in
their approach to international banking and funds. Perhaps it’s just a last
jibe: an “I told you so” move that satisfies no one but himself.
However, the politician spoke out last week, stating “The
Eurozone was flawed from the beginning”.
These are no doubt so bold and troubling words, at a time
when the Eurozone has never looked so increasingly fragile. More countries turn
to the Markozy central block for loans and bailout plans in an web of
dependency that is surely already too far stretched. With other key members
such as Spain and Italy, not thought of as in danger until quite recently,
defaulting, there is a huge lack of faith in the value of the Euro, and its
shared unit only serves to weaken those central powerhouses further.
Why the sudden backlash from Delors? As head of the European
Commission from 1985 to 1995, he played a key role in the process that launched
the euro and his comments effectively bring about questions of its true
validity.
Delors claims that the single unit is not itself at fault,
but “a fault in execution” by those who saw its implementation, who did not
consider the economic backgrounds of certain member states. He continued by
adding that “the finance ministers did not want to see anything disagreeable”
and so instead of focussing on kinks of the single currency, they blindly
promoted its benefits regardless.
Perhaps his most poignant move is to admit that those, like
the British, who objected to the Euro certainly “had a point.”
In fact, a jump (or at least jump by today’s variable
standard) was seen in the pound vs the Euro trading after this admission was
made. Trade rendered £1 worth €1.17-€1.18. Not that this
necessarily signals a growing strength in the pound, but rather a worse Euro.
And Britain should remain wary of this, for its markets are key traders in the
Euro currency. Our own economic growth is dependent on the fiscal balance
sheets of Europe, even if we like to disagree.
On Friday, German Chancellor Angela Merkel said Europe was
working towards setting up a "fiscal union", in an effort to impose
budget discipline by members.
Yet, this surely would have been a logical launch issue? In
some regards, it seems the lax approach to the Eurozone was deliberate,
creating a free for all market, wherein all countries could reap the rewards.
Bearing the consequence was never at the forefront of decision making.
And if the Euro should collapse, where will blame rest? With
the French and German governments who prop and support and continue to make crucial
decisions for the future of their economies? With the lesser countries who
added to the imbalance of outgoing money? With the lack of a central union from
the beginning?
Delors doesn’t have a definite answer, but sees all the
moves of leading parties as “too little, too late”. But then is this the fault of Delors in his initial approach to the Euro itself? The history books will decide.
No comments:
Post a Comment